Lagatar24.com
Language : HINDI
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Saturday, 19 September, 2026
Lagatar24.com
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Lagatar24.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Home National & International

SC to hear pleas challenging Places of Worship Act on October 11

Lagatar News by Lagatar News
September 9, 2022
in National & International
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Lagatar24 Desk

 

New Delhi, Sept 9: The Supreme Court will hear arguments contesting the Places of Worship Act on October 11. The appeals will be heard by a three-judge panel.

All applications, including the one submitted by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, were granted permission to intervene in the hearing of the arguments about the legality of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 by a three-judge bench chaired by Chief Justice Uday Umesh Lalit.

The parties were urged to finish their pleadings by that date by the bench, which also included Justices S Ravindra Bhat and P S Narasimha. On October 11, a three-judge panel was appointed to hear the cases.

One of the petitioner’s attorneys claimed that the Places of Worship Act was being interpreted by the courts in Kashi and Mathura.

UU Lalit, the Chief Justice of India (CJI), asserted that the supreme court could not halt the legal processes in Mathura and Kashi.

“Let those proceedings continue,” he said.

The CJI noted that the Centre has not yet responded to the petitions contesting the provisions of the Places of Worship Act. The Solicitor General has also requested more time to submit a response.

Notably, on March 12 of last year, the Supreme Court sought the Center’s answer to one of the arguments made by attorney Ashwini Upadhyay challenging the validity of certain provisions of the law which provides maintaining the status quo with regard to ownership and the character of religious places as prevailing on August 15, 1947.

Share76Tweet47
Previous Post

Hazaribagh: MLA Amba Prasad hands over Rs 9 lakh cheque to kin of deceased in elephant attack

Next Post

Bike-borne criminals loot SUV of Ranchi residents on NH-33 in Chandil

Related Posts

Human Trafficking Case: 9, Including 8 Bangladeshi Nationals, Get Life Imprisonment

Human Trafficking Case: 9, Including 8 Bangladeshi Nationals, Get Life Imprisonment

September 18, 2026
Flying IndiGo Gets Costlier: Infant Tickets, Baggage and Other Service Charges Hiked

Flying IndiGo Gets Costlier: Infant Tickets, Baggage and Other Service Charges Hiked

September 18, 2026
Election Commission Freezes Trinamool Congress Name and Symbol Amid Banerjee vs Banerjee Split

Election Commission Freezes Trinamool Congress Name and Symbol Amid Banerjee vs Banerjee Split

September 17, 2026
Congress MPs Reject ‘No Dissent’ Claim on UPI MDR, Say No Proposal Was Ever Placed Before Committee

Congress MPs Reject ‘No Dissent’ Claim on UPI MDR, Say No Proposal Was Ever Placed Before Committee

September 17, 2026
Tata Sons Board Approves N Chandrasekaran’s Reappointment as Chairman for Another 5 Years

Tata Sons Board Approves N Chandrasekaran’s Reappointment as Chairman for Another 5 Years

September 17, 2026
US Warns India, China to ‘Clean Up Their Act’ Over Russian Oil Trade

US Warns India, China to ‘Clean Up Their Act’ Over Russian Oil Trade

September 17, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Editor
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)