Lagatar24.com
Language : HINDI
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Sunday, 10 May, 2026
Lagatar24.com
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Lagatar24.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Home National & International

Mathura court to hear Krishna Janmabhoomi case today

Lagatar News by Lagatar News
July 7, 2022
in National & International
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

 

Lagatar24 Desk

 

Lucknow, July 7: A hearing in the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi case will take place today in Mathura’s court of civil judge (senior division), as the Shahi Eidgah mosque management committee pushes for the resolution of the application contesting the case’s maintainability.

The attorneys for petitioner deity Thakur Keshav Dev Maharaj are advocating for the appointment of a court commissioner (ameen) to conduct a survey of the Shahi Eidgah mosque, whose removal the petitioners want.

The Shahi Eidgah mosque was allegedly built on a portion of a 13.37-acre plot of property that belongs to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, according to petitioners in almost a dozen petitions related to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi controversy that was filed in Mathura court. They have demanded that the trust receive its ownership of the mosque land back.

Petitioners speaking on behalf of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi have contested the 12.10.1968 settlement between Shahi Masjid Eidgah and Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh, which was a component of suit no. 43 of 1967. Because the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, which has ownership and title, was not a party to the settlement, the petitioners contend that it lacks legal validity.

Along with other opposing parties, the management committee of the Shahi Eidgah mosque objected to these petitions, claiming that they had been submitted with the undue delay because the compromise had been reached in 1968 but the ruling and decree in case number 43 of 1967 had only been rendered in 1974. They argued that as a result, the petition as a whole was null and void.

Additionally, the petitioners assert that the mosque was erected where a temple had previously been destroyed by Aurangzeb, the Mughal emperor.

Share76Tweet47
Previous Post

Ramgarh: Young farmer dies of electrocution at Gola

Next Post

SC to hear Alt News co-founder Md Zubair’s petition tomorrow

Related Posts

PM Modi Salutes Armed Forces on Operation Sindoor’s First Anniversary

PM Modi Salutes Armed Forces on Operation Sindoor’s First Anniversary

May 7, 2026
Operation Sindoor at One Year: India Downed 13 Pakistani Aircraft, Destroyed 11 Bases, Armed Forces Reveal

Operation Sindoor at One Year: India Downed 13 Pakistani Aircraft, Destroyed 11 Bases, Armed Forces Reveal

May 7, 2026
Tamil Nadu Governor Sends Vijay Back Again, Demands Proof of Majority

Tamil Nadu Governor Sends Vijay Back Again, Demands Proof of Majority

May 7, 2026
In 49 Bengal Seats, Removed Voters Outnumbered the Victory Margin

In 49 Bengal Seats, Removed Voters Outnumbered the Victory Margin

May 7, 2026
Mamata Refuses to Quit, Bengal Heads Toward Constitutional Crisis

Mamata Refuses to Quit, Bengal Heads Toward Constitutional Crisis

May 6, 2026
Twin Blasts Near Defence Establishments in Punjab Trigger Security Alarm

Twin Blasts Near Defence Establishments in Punjab Trigger Security Alarm

May 6, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Editor
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)