Lagatar24.com
Language : HINDI
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Monday, 26 January, 2026
Lagatar24.com
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Lagatar24.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Home National & International

Plea in SC challenges Delhi HC’s split verdict on criminalising marital rape

Lagatar News by Lagatar News
May 17, 2022
in National & International
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Lagatar24 Desk

New Delhi, May 17: An appeal has been filed in the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court’s split verdict on the criminalization of marital rape.

Khushboo Saifi, one of the petitioners who challenged the validity of the marital rape exception under Section 375 IPC (rape) on the grounds that it discriminated against married women sexually raped by their husbands, filed the appeal.

Forceful sexual intercourse by a man with his wife who is not under the age of 15 is not considered rape under Exception 2 of IPC Section 375 (rape). In plain English, Exception 2 of Section 375 decriminalises marital rape or declares that forced sexual intercourse between a man and his wife in a marriage is not rape.

On May 11, a division bench of the Delhi High Court, consisting of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar, issued a split verdict in the matter. Justice Shakdher declared the provision unlawful, while Justice Shankar affirmed it.

After reaching a split decision in the case, the bench gave the petitioners permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. Both justices also observed that the case raises a substantial point of law, which would require the Supreme Court’s attention. Both judges also noted that the issue involves a “substantial question of law” and therefore would have to be considered by the Supreme Court.

Share76Tweet47
Previous Post

CBI searches at premises of Congress’s Karti Chidambaram

Next Post

Dhanbad railway division to set up water ATMs at 11 stations

Related Posts

India Showcases Strike Power at Republic Day with Post-Sindoor Arsenal

India Showcases Strike Power at Republic Day with Post-Sindoor Arsenal

January 26, 2026
India Celebrates Republic Day 2026 Honouring 150 Years of Vande Mataram

India Celebrates Republic Day 2026 Honouring 150 Years of Vande Mataram

January 26, 2026
Ted Cruz Blames Trump Team For Blocking India Trade Pact, Cites Infighting

Ted Cruz Blames Trump Team For Blocking India Trade Pact, Cites Infighting

January 26, 2026
India Set to Slash EU Car Import Tariffs Under Landmark Trade Deal

India Set to Slash EU Car Import Tariffs Under Landmark Trade Deal

January 26, 2026
Europe Takes Center Stage at India’s 77th Republic Day Parade

Europe Takes Center Stage at India’s 77th Republic Day Parade

January 26, 2026
Congress Rift Deepens as MP Downplays Tharoor’s Role in Party

Congress Rift Deepens as MP Downplays Tharoor’s Role in Party

January 24, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Editor
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)