Lagatar24.com
Language : HINDI
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Saturday, 26 September, 2026
Lagatar24.com
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Lagatar24.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Home National & International

Keeping Collegium recommendations on hold unacceptable: SC issues notice to union law secretary

Lagatar News by Lagatar News
November 11, 2022
in National & International
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Lagatar24 Desk

 

New Delhi, Nov 11: On a petition about the holdup in approving the names recommended by the Collegium for appointment as judges, the Supreme Court on Friday gave notice to the Union Law Secretary.

A bench made up of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay Sreeniwas Oka strongly criticised the Centre for withholding the names that had been authorised by the Collegium while deliberating the case.

The Advocates Association Bengaluru had petitioned the court for contempt in 2021 for the Centre’s refusal to approve 11 names that had been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court collegium.

The Association argued that the Center’s actions constitute a flagrant disregard for the Supreme Court’s directives in the case of PLR Projects Ltd v. Mahanadi Coalfields Pvt Ltd, which required the Centre to clear names repeated by the Collegium within 3 or 4 weeks.

The bench noted that the Centre has left the files open in the cases of 11 names that the collegium has reaffirmed, without approving them or returning them with reservations. The bench deemed this practise of withholding permission to be “inappropriate.”

“There are 11 cases pending with the government which were cleared by the collegium but are awaiting appointments…. This implies that the government neither appoints the names nor communicates its reservations if any”, the bench observed in the order.

The bench stated that delay in clearing the names can lead to the recommended persons withdrawing their consent for judgeship and this can deprive the system of eminent persons

“Keeping names on hold is not acceptable. It is becoming some sort of a device to compel these persons to withdraw their consent as has happened”, the bench noted in the order.

 

 

 

 

 

Share76Tweet47
Previous Post

SC orders release of all convicts in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case

Next Post

Question Jharkhand’s lone Left MLA Vinod Singh in ‘Newsmaker in Newsroom’

Related Posts

“Gyanesh Kumar Running Election Commission on His Own Terms”: Congress Attacks CEC Over Modi Ties

September 23, 2026

Two Election Commissioners Raised 14 Written Objections Against CEC’s Decisions, Report Finds

September 23, 2026

ED Raids 16 Locations in Kolkata, Delhi and Bengaluru Over Forex Violation Case

September 23, 2026
Supreme Court to Hear DGP Appointment Case on September 22

Supreme Court to Hear DGP Appointment Case on September 22

September 21, 2026
Jharkhand Set for Five Days of Rain, Winds Up to 50 kmph Likely

MP Nishikant Dubey to Sue Former Finance Secretary Subhash Garg Over Lobbying Allegations

September 21, 2026
Iran Lays Out Seven Conditions for US, Awaits Trump’s Response

Iran Lays Out Seven Conditions for US, Awaits Trump’s Response

September 20, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Editor
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)