Lagatar24.com
Language : HINDI
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Wednesday, 11 November, 2026
Lagatar24.com
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Lagatar24.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion
Home National & International

SC upholds center’s decision on One Rank, One Pension

Lagatar News by Lagatar News
March 16, 2022
in National & International
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Lagatar24 Desk

New Delhi, March 16: The Supreme Court upheld the government’s One Rank, One Pension (OROP) ruling on Wednesday, stating that the OROP policy had no constitutional flaws.

The Supreme Court upheld the method in which the Central Government implemented the OROP programme in the defence forces, as per its November 7, 2015 notification.

We find no constitutional infirmity in the principle OROP adopted,” said the court.

On February 23, a bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud deferred its decision, asking the Centre whether ex-hardships servicemen’s could be alleviated to some extent if the periodic review of OROP was shortened from five years to a shorter term.

The Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM) brought the case against the Centre’s OROP formula through counsel Balaji Srinivasan.

The Supreme Court has stated that whatever decision it makes would be based on concepts rather than numbers.

The Centre had previously stated that when the revision occurs after five years, the maximum last drawn pay, which takes into consideration all variables and is paid to the lowest in the bracket, is the golden mean.

“When we framed the policy, we didn’t want anyone post-Independence to be left behind. The equalisation was done. We covered the entire past 60-70 years. Now, to amend it through the court’s direction, the implications are not known to us. Anything with finance and economics has to be considered with caution. Period of five years is reasonable and it has financial implications also”, it had said.

 

 

Share76Tweet47
Previous Post

XLRI Jamshedpur hosts 5th Social Entrepreneurship Conclave virtually

Next Post

SC to consider listing of pleas related to hijab ban after Holi vacations

Related Posts

Sonia Gandhi’s “Belonging” Recounts Strained Ties with Menaka Gandhi in the Family Home

November 10, 2026

Sonia Gandhi’s Memoir “Belonging: A Journey of Love” Released, with Remarks on Modi, Manmohan Singh and Indira Gandhi

November 10, 2026

60 Madhya Pradesh Youth Congress Office-Bearers Suspended for Skipping Ramlila Maidan Rally

November 4, 2026

Democrats Sweep US Midterms, Leaving Trump a “Lame Duck” and Republicans Questioning Their Path

November 4, 2026

Cyclone Murasu Hits Andhra Pradesh Coast, Heavy Rain and Strong Winds Lash Kothapatnam and Vijayawada

November 3, 2026

Villagers Attack BSF Personnel in Tripura, Company Commander Among Three Injured

November 3, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About Editor
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Jharkhand
  • Bihar
  • National & World
  • Business
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Career
  • Tech – Gyan
  • Opinion

© 2024 Lagatar News (Lagatar24.com)